Split Test Board
Every live split test — what we're testing, who's winning, how sure we are. All results count only the time both pages ran side-by-side in an equal split (traffic a control got while running alone is excluded). Revenue = Checkout Champ COMPLETE orders only, QA/internal orders excluded. Self-hosted page views updated 2026-09-08 10:35 (GMT+7). What do these numbers mean? A winner is called at 95% confidence + 100 paid orders per arm (day-14 stop-loss). Updated 2026-09-08, 10:36 (GMT+7). Daily buckets are CC accounting days.
Data window: complete Checkout Champ days only, ending 2026-09-06 (CC day) · refreshed 2026-09-08, 10:36 GMT+7 · next refresh 12:00 GMT+7 daily. A CC day ends at midnight New York = 11:00 GMT+7, so the newest complete day is always the previous CC day; today's orders are never counted.
CC-hosted checkouts (CartClick)
Aether™ pendant checkout page
Checkout page: v4 (new) vs v2.1a (control)
camp 167 · CartClick · CC-hosted
5 complete days of data
Updated 10 minutes ago · 2026-09-08 10:25 GMT+7EARLY
new v4 checkout design challenging the proven v2.1a control (winner of the v2.1a-vs-v3a test) · window: 5 complete CC days — from 2026-09-02 21:34 (GMT+7) (both pages live together) through end of 2026-09-06. Today is never counted; CC-hosted and self-hosted cards use this same rule.
Split check: traffic share v4 46% / v2.1a 54% — even ✓
2,073ad clicks (fb → funnel)
$2.59RPC — rev per ad click
$1.76cost per click
+$0.83margin per click
1.47×ROAS (tracked campaigns)
$14,746.17revenue — these pages (all routes)
RPC/ROAS use the tracker's own attributed revenue ($5,377.88) and clicks via ClickFlare "aether167" (visits=ad clicks) — one consistent universe. ⚠ These pages actually took $14,746.17 in the window — other campaigns/routes also feed them; RPC covers only the tracked ones. Per-arm decisions stay on the $ / checkout start columns.
v4 ⭐
| page views | collecting… |
| checkout starts | 105 |
| paid orders | 66 |
| form→sale rate | 62.9% |
| tried to pay (card/PayPal) | 76% |
| card approval (the bank) | 75% · 14 declined |
| $ / checkout start | $67.20 |
| AOV | $106.92 |
| revenue (window) | $7,056.42 |
| upsell take | 45% |
open page ↗
v2.1a
| page views | collecting… |
| checkout starts | 124 |
| paid orders | 62 |
| form→sale rate | 50.0% |
| tried to pay (card/PayPal) | 67% |
| card approval (the bank) | 70% · 21 declined |
| $ / checkout start | $62.01 |
| AOV | $124.03 |
| revenue (window) | $7,689.75 |
| upsell take | 60% |
open page ↗
Paid orders per day (v4 v2.1a)
v4 is ahead · we are 67.7% sure (a winner is called at 95%)
Why v4 is ahead
v4 makes $67.20 per checkout start vs $62.01 — a 8% gap. It wins on
conversion — 63% of starts buy vs 50% — even though its orders are smaller ($106.92 vs $124.03 AOV). Why: bank approval is level (75% vs 70%) — the difference is the page, not the gateway; v4 persuades more people to actually press pay (76% vs 67%); v2.1a upsells better (60% vs 45%) but not enough to close the gap.
Based on 128 paid orders across 5 complete days — not yet enough to call.
KEEP RUNNING
confidence 67.7% of 95% · 62 of 100 paid in the smaller arm
~4 more days to the 100-paid floor (≈ 2026-09-12).
Solvane™ bracelet (neuropathy) checkout page
Checkout page: v2 (new) vs v1 (control)
camp 209 · CartClick · CC-hosted
5 complete days of data
Updated 10 minutes ago · 2026-09-08 10:25 GMT+7STRONG LEAN
first-ever checkout challenger (v2) vs the original v1 · window: 5 complete CC days — from 2026-09-02 23:00 (GMT+7) (both pages live together) through end of 2026-09-06. Today is never counted; CC-hosted and self-hosted cards use this same rule.
Split check: traffic share v2 50% / v1 50% — even ✓
$7,217.98revenue — these pages (CC orders)
—RPC (no click source wired)
v2 ⭐
| page views | collecting… |
| checkout starts | 45 |
| paid orders | 33 |
| form→sale rate | 73.3% |
| tried to pay (card/PayPal) | 84% |
| card approval (the bank) | 75% · 5 declined |
| $ / checkout start | $96.16 |
| AOV | $131.13 |
| revenue (window) | $4,327.30 |
| upsell take | 61% |
open page ↗
v1
| page views | collecting… |
| checkout starts | 45 |
| paid orders | 30 |
| form→sale rate | 66.7% |
| tried to pay (card/PayPal) | 71% |
| card approval (the bank) | 92% · 1 declined |
| $ / checkout start | $64.24 |
| AOV | $96.36 |
| revenue (window) | $2,890.68 |
| upsell take | 47% |
open page ↗
Paid orders per day (v2 v1)
v2 is ahead · we are 96.0% sure (a winner is called at 95%)
Why v2 is ahead
v2 makes $96.16 per checkout start vs $64.24 — a 50% gap. It wins on
conversion: 73% of starts buy vs 67%, and its orders are bigger too ($131.13 vs $96.36). Why: card approval is close (75% vs 92%), so this is the page working rather than bank luck; v2 persuades more people to actually press pay (84% vs 71%); v2 also upsells better (61% vs 47%).
Based on 63 paid orders across 5 complete days — not yet enough to call.
KEEP RUNNING
30 of 100 paid in the smaller arm
at this pace the 100-paid floor is NOT reachable by day 14 — expect a no-difference call unless traffic scales.
Larkspur™ checkout page
Checkout page: v2 (new) vs v1 (control)
camp 207 · CartClick · CC-hosted
5 complete days of data
Updated 10 minutes ago · 2026-09-08 10:25 GMT+7STRONG LEAN
first-ever checkout challenger (v2) vs the original v1 · window: 5 complete CC days — from 2026-09-02 23:56 (GMT+7) (both pages live together) through end of 2026-09-06. Today is never counted; CC-hosted and self-hosted cards use this same rule.
Split check: traffic share v2 46% / v1 54% — even ✓
$7,628.48revenue — these pages (CC orders)
—RPC (no click source wired)
v2 ⭐
| page views | collecting… |
| checkout starts | 78 |
| paid orders | 61 |
| form→sale rate | 78.2% |
| tried to pay (card/PayPal) | 90% |
| card approval (the bank) | 79% · 9 declined |
| $ / checkout start | $54.49 |
| AOV | $69.68 |
| revenue (window) | $4,250.60 |
| upsell take | 21% |
open page ↗
v1
| page views | collecting… |
| checkout starts | 93 |
| paid orders | 48 |
| form→sale rate | 51.6% |
| tried to pay (card/PayPal) | 67% |
| card approval (the bank) | 72% · 13 declined |
| $ / checkout start | $36.32 |
| AOV | $70.37 |
| revenue (window) | $3,377.88 |
| upsell take | 23% |
open page ↗
Paid orders per day (v2 v1)
v2 is ahead · we are 99.9% sure (a winner is called at 95%)
Why v2 is ahead
v2 makes $54.49 per checkout start vs $36.32 — a 50% gap. It wins on
conversion: 78% of starts buy vs 52%. Why: card approval is close (79% vs 72%), so this is the page working rather than bank luck; v2 persuades more people to actually press pay (90% vs 67%).
Based on 109 paid orders across 5 complete days — enough to act on if you agree.
READY
99.9% confident with a 50% money gap on 48 paid per arm — decisive enough to call before the 100-paid floor
(fast lane)
Nothing has changed and nothing will change on its own. If you agree, reply: end larkspur-207-checkout-v2, ship v2.
To end it (Checkout Champ — you do this one): CC → campaign 207 → page rotation: switch off Larkspur™ - 207 - Checkout - v1 and leave Larkspur™ - 207 - Checkout - v2 taking 100%.
Schorl bracelet checkout page
Checkout page: v2 (new) vs v1.1 (control)
camp 145 · CartClick · CC-hosted
5 complete days of data
Updated 10 minutes ago · 2026-09-08 10:26 GMT+7EARLY
new v2 checkout vs the v1.1 control · window: 5 complete CC days — from 2026-09-02 23:50 (GMT+7) (both pages live together) through end of 2026-09-06. Today is never counted; CC-hosted and self-hosted cards use this same rule.
Split check: traffic share v2 44% / v1.1 56% — even ✓
2,954ad clicks (fb → funnel)
$2.07RPC — rev per ad click
$2.17cost per click
−$0.11margin per click
0.95×ROAS (tracked campaigns)
$8,486.90revenue — these pages (all routes)
RPC/ROAS use the tracker's own attributed revenue ($6,106.41) and clicks via ClickFlare "schorl145" (visits=ad clicks) — one consistent universe. ⚠ These pages actually took $8,486.90 in the window — other campaigns/routes also feed them; RPC covers only the tracked ones. Per-arm decisions stay on the $ / checkout start columns.
v2 ⭐
| page views | collecting… |
| checkout starts | 74 |
| paid orders | 43 |
| form→sale rate | 58.1% |
| tried to pay (card/PayPal) | 74% |
| card approval (the bank) | 70% · 12 declined |
| $ / checkout start | $51.01 |
| AOV | $87.79 |
| revenue (window) | $3,775.02 |
| upsell take | 47% |
open page ↗
v1.1
| page views | collecting… |
| checkout starts | 93 |
| paid orders | 49 |
| form→sale rate | 52.7% |
| tried to pay (card/PayPal) | 68% |
| card approval (the bank) | 59% · 14 declined |
| $ / checkout start | $50.67 |
| AOV | $96.16 |
| revenue (window) | $4,711.88 |
| upsell take | 51% |
open page ↗
Paid orders per day (v2 v1.1)
v2 is ahead · we are 51.3% sure (a winner is called at 95%)
Why v2 is ahead
v2 makes $51.01 per checkout start vs $50.67 — a 1% gap. It wins on
conversion — 58% of starts buy vs 53% — even though its orders are smaller ($87.79 vs $96.16 AOV). Why: card approval is close (70% vs 59%), so this is the page working rather than bank luck; v2 persuades more people to actually press pay (74% vs 68%).
Based on 92 paid orders across 5 complete days — not yet enough to call.
KEEP RUNNING
confidence 51.3% of 95% · 43 of 100 paid in the smaller arm
~7 more days to the 100-paid floor (≈ 2026-09-15).
Anti-Smoking Bracelet™ checkout page
Checkout page: v3 (new) vs v2 (control)
camp 67 · CartClick · CC-hosted
5 complete days of data
Updated 9 minutes ago · 2026-09-08 10:26 GMT+7STRONG LEAN
new v3 checkout vs the v2 control · window: 5 complete CC days — from 2026-09-02 22:20 (GMT+7) (both pages live together) through end of 2026-09-06. Today is never counted; CC-hosted and self-hosted cards use this same rule.
Split check: traffic share v3 42% / v2 58% — even ✓
8,770ad clicks (fb → funnel)
$2.39RPC — rev per ad click
$2.50cost per click
−$0.11margin per click
0.96×ROAS (tracked campaigns)
$15,306.14revenue — these pages (all routes)
RPC/ROAS use the tracker's own attributed revenue ($20,933.26) and clicks via RedTrack "trusthappytoday.com" (6 campaigns w/ traffic) — one consistent universe. ⚠ These pages actually took $15,306.14 in the window — other campaigns/routes also feed them; RPC covers only the tracked ones. Per-arm decisions stay on the $ / checkout start columns.
v3 ⭐
| page views | collecting… |
| checkout starts | 134 |
| paid orders | 82 |
| form→sale rate | 61.2% |
| tried to pay (card/PayPal) | 80% |
| card approval (the bank) | 74% · 24 declined |
| $ / checkout start | $51.36 |
| AOV | $83.93 |
| revenue (window) | $6,881.95 |
| upsell take | 41% |
open page ↗
v2
| page views | collecting… |
| checkout starts | 187 |
| paid orders | 100 |
| form→sale rate | 53.5% |
| tried to pay (card/PayPal) | 67% |
| card approval (the bank) | 74% · 25 declined |
| $ / checkout start | $45.05 |
| AOV | $84.24 |
| revenue (window) | $8,424.19 |
| upsell take | 42% |
open page ↗
Paid orders per day (v3 v2)
v3 is ahead · we are 83.5% sure (a winner is called at 95%)
Why v3 is ahead
v3 makes $51.36 per checkout start vs $45.05 — a 14% gap. It wins on
conversion: 61% of starts buy vs 53%. Why: bank approval is level (74% vs 74%) — the difference is the page, not the gateway; v3 persuades more people to actually press pay (80% vs 67%).
Based on 182 paid orders across 5 complete days — not yet enough to call.
KEEP RUNNING
confidence 83.5% of 95% · 82 of 100 paid in the smaller arm
~2 more days to the 100-paid floor (≈ 2026-09-10).
Pixiu Mantra Ring checkout page
Checkout page: v5c vs v5b vs v5a (control) — one 3-way test, equal 33% split
camp 47 · CartClick · CC-hosted
6 complete days of data
Updated 8 minutes ago · 2026-09-08 10:28 GMT+7STRONG LEAN
two challengers (v5c, v5b — both derivatives of the shipped v5a winner) against the v5a control in a single CC rotation · window: 6 complete CC days — from 2026-09-01 11:53 (GMT+7) (both pages live together) through end of 2026-09-06. Today is never counted; CC-hosted and self-hosted cards use this same rule.
Split check: traffic share v5a 34% / v5c 34% / v5b 32% — even ✓
5,110ad clicks (fb → funnel)
$2.11RPC — rev per ad click
$1.73cost per click
+$0.38margin per click
1.22×ROAS (tracked campaigns)
$43,701.25revenue — these pages (all routes)
RPC/ROAS use the tracker's own attributed revenue ($10,770.87) and clicks via ClickFlare "pixiu47" (visits=ad clicks) — one consistent universe. ⚠ These pages actually took $43,701.25 in the window — other campaigns/routes also feed them; RPC covers only the tracked ones. Per-arm decisions stay on the $ / checkout start columns.
v5a
| page views | collecting… |
| checkout starts | 357 |
| paid orders | 149 |
| form→sale rate | 41.7% |
| tried to pay (card/PayPal) | 64% |
| approval (the bank) | 65% · 80 declined |
| $ / checkout start | $40.27 |
| AOV | $96.48 |
| revenue (window) | $14,375.02 |
| upsell take | 34% |
open page ↗
v5c ⭐
| page views | collecting… |
| checkout starts | 357 |
| paid orders | 160 |
| form→sale rate | 44.8% |
| tried to pay (card/PayPal) | 68% |
| approval (the bank) | 66% · 81 declined |
| $ / checkout start | $43.04 |
| AOV | $96.03 |
| revenue (window) | $15,364.74 |
| upsell take | 29% |
open page ↗
v5b
| page views | collecting… |
| checkout starts | 334 |
| paid orders | 135 |
| form→sale rate | 40.4% |
| tried to pay (card/PayPal) | 64% |
| approval (the bank) | 63% · 79 declined |
| $ / checkout start | $41.80 |
| AOV | $103.42 |
| revenue (window) | $13,961.49 |
| upsell take | 38% |
open page ↗
Paid orders per day (v5a v5c v5b)
v5c is ahead · we are 58.9% sure (a winner is called at 95%)
Why v5c is ahead
v5c makes $43.04 per checkout start vs $40.27 — a 7% gap. It wins on
conversion: 45% of starts buy vs 42%.
Based on 309 paid orders across 6 complete days — not yet enough to call.
3-way comparison is descriptive — the ship decision comes from the registered pairwise tests (no valid simultaneous N-way probability yet).
KEEP RUNNING
3-way comparison is descriptive — the ship decision comes from the registered pairwise tests
paid floor met.
Self-hosted funnels (Trust Apollo)
VitalTac flashlight checkout page
Checkout design: v3 (Pixiu-style) vs v2 (current)
camp 1 · Trust Apollo · self-hosted (getvitaltac.com)
7 complete days of data
Updated 3 minutes ago · 2026-09-08 10:32 GMT+7STRONG LEAN
v3 = Pixiu-v5c design reskin of v2; DESIGN-only split, sticky 50/50 (localStorage vt_cv) · window: 7 complete CC days — from 2026-09-02 01:16 (GMT+7) (both pages live together) through end of 2026-09-08. Today is never counted; CC-hosted and self-hosted cards use this same rule.
Split check: traffic share v3 50% / v2 50% — even ✓
PayPal note: a PayPal abandon counts as a checkout start but not a pay-attempt, which deflates "tried to pay" — both arms carry identical payment options so the comparison stays fair (M-010); the PayPal-orders row shows the mix.
9,617ad clicks (fb → funnel)
$4.04RPC — rev per ad click
$2.90cost per click
+$1.14margin per click
1.39×ROAS (tracked campaigns)
$54,785.81revenue — these pages (all routes)
RPC/ROAS use the tracker's own attributed revenue ($38,858.99) and clicks via RedTrack "vitaltac" (11 campaigns w/ traffic) — one consistent universe. ⚠ These pages actually took $54,785.81 in the window — other campaigns/routes also feed them; RPC covers only the tracked ones. Per-arm decisions stay on the $ / checkout start columns.
v3 ⭐
| page views | 2556 |
| checkout starts | 304 |
| paid orders | 224 |
| TRUE CVR (paid/views) | 8.8% |
| $ per page view | $10.65 |
| view → form start | 12% |
| form→sale rate | 73.7% |
| tried to pay (card/PayPal) | 93% |
| card approval (the bank) | 69% · 45 declined ⚠ |
| PayPal share of orders | 53% |
| $ / checkout start | $89.54 |
| AOV | $121.52 |
| revenue (window) | $27,220.18 |
| PayPal orders | 161 |
open page ↗
v2
| page views | 2574 |
| checkout starts | 310 |
| paid orders | 241 |
| TRUE CVR (paid/views) | 9.4% |
| $ per page view | $10.71 |
| view → form start | 12% |
| form→sale rate | 77.7% |
| tried to pay (card/PayPal) | 91% |
| card approval (the bank) | 80% · 34 declined ⚠ |
| PayPal share of orders | 46% |
| $ / checkout start | $88.92 |
| AOV | $114.38 |
| revenue (window) | $27,565.63 |
| PayPal orders | 144 |
open page ↗
Paid orders per day (v3 v2)
v3 is ahead · we are 54.1% sure (a winner is called at 95%)
Why v3 is ahead
v3 makes $89.54 per checkout start vs $88.92 — a 1% gap. It wins on
order size: $121.52 average order vs $114.38, with conversion about level (74% vs 78%). Why: ⚠ card approval differs a lot (69% vs 80%) — a page cannot move a bank, so treat this gap as gateway luck, not a page win.
Based on 465 paid orders across 7 complete days — not yet enough to call.
INVALID
failing approval-rate-equality — fix the test before reading it
No winner should be read from this test until the guard passes — the arms are not comparable right now.
InfiniteFi advertorial page
Funnel path: straight to checkout (advco) vs via sales page (advsales)
camp 109 · Trust Apollo · self-hosted (offer.tryinfinitefi.com)
6 complete days of data
Updated 3 minutes ago · 2026-09-08 10:33 GMT+7STRONG LEAN
path split after the advertorial: straight to checkout (FT:advco) vs via sales page (FT:advsales); sticky 50/50 (localStorage ifi_ft) · window: 6 complete CC days — from 2026-09-02 17:45 (GMT+7) (both pages live together) through end of 2026-09-08. Today is never counted; CC-hosted and self-hosted cards use this same rule.
Split check: traffic share advco 47% / advsales 53% — even ✓
Both routes get equal 50/50 sticky traffic, so their totals compare directly. Card-submit/approval are not shown — the checkout page itself is identical on both routes.
3,258ad clicks (fb → funnel)
$2.17RPC — rev per ad click
$1.46cost per click
+$0.71margin per click
1.49×ROAS (tracked campaigns)
$12,961.48revenue — these pages (all routes)
RPC/ROAS use the tracker's own attributed revenue ($7,071.26) and clicks via RedTrack "tryinfinitefi.com" (1 campaigns w/ traffic) — one consistent universe. ⚠ These pages actually took $12,961.48 in the window — other campaigns/routes also feed them; RPC covers only the tracked ones. Per-arm decisions stay on the equal-traffic revenue columns.
advco ⭐
| people on this route | 4175 |
| reached checkout | 77 |
| purchased | 57 |
| route CVR (bought ÷ people) | 1.4% |
| revenue (equal traffic) | $7,104.15 |
| AOV | $124.63 |
| PayPal orders | 37 |
open page ↗
advsales
| people on this route | 3953 |
| reached checkout | 86 |
| purchased | 60 |
| route CVR (bought ÷ people) | 1.5% |
| revenue (equal traffic) | $5,857.33 |
| AOV | $97.62 |
| PayPal orders | 44 |
open page ↗
Paid orders per day (advco advsales)
advco is ahead · we are 97.7% sure (a winner is called at 95%)
Why advco is ahead
advco earns $92.26 per person sent down it vs $68.11 for advsales — a 35% difference on equal traffic. It wins on
conversion: 74% of starts buy vs 70%, and its orders are bigger too ($124.63 vs $97.62). Why: card approval is close (80% vs 67%), so this is the page working rather than bank luck.
Based on 117 paid orders across 6 complete days — not yet enough to call.
KEEP RUNNING
57 of 100 paid in the smaller arm
~5 more days to the 100-paid floor (≈ 2026-09-13).
Decided — final results
Aether checkout v2.1a vs v3a
DECIDED for v2.1a (D-007, P=99.9%); v3a has had zero traffic since 08-23 · final read 2026-09-01 (window 2026-08-20 → 2026-09-01)
DECIDED · 99.9%
startspaidCVR$/startAOV
v2.1a 🏆87944851.0%$56.35$110.55
v3a2549838.6%$40.32$104.51
Pixiu checkout v3a vs v5a
CONCLUDED — ship v5a at 100.0% (run 2026-08-30-camp47); v5a is now the control · final read 2026-09-01 (window 2026-08-26 → 2026-09-01)
DECIDED · 100.0%
startspaidCVR$/startAOV
v3a75426935.7%$35.34$99.06
v5a 🏆81137045.6%$48.27$105.81
Pixiu checkout v4a vs v3a
superseded by the v5a series; day-14 stop-loss passed 2026-09-02 · final read 2026-09-01 (window 2026-08-19 → 2026-09-01)
DECIDED · 79.5%
startspaidCVR$/startAOV
v4a118639833.6%$34.52$102.87
v3a 🏆182867336.8%$36.53$99.23
GhostWing drone
Checkout design: v3 (Pixiu-style) vs v2 (current) — both with PayPal
DECIDED 2026-09-07 — owner approved shipping v2 to 100% (99.8% confidence, +41% $/checkout start). v3 retired to QA-only (?cv=v3). · final read 2026-09-08 (window 2026-09-02 → 2026-09-08)
DECIDED · 99.9%
startspaidCVR$/startAOV
v2 🏆1159885.2%$158.38$185.86
v3896876.4%$115.79$151.55